October 20, 2025
Welcome to our comparison between OFP and DNA Funded, where we evaluate the key aspects of both proprietary trading firms, including their funding programs, trading rules, platforms, and community feedback.
| Company Details | OFP | DNA Funded |
|---|---|---|
| Incorporation date | February 2022 | October 2024 |
| CEO | Ruggero Catalano Rossi Danielli | Martin Doepke |
| Office Location | London, UK | Melbourne, Australia |
| Scaling Plan | ✅ | ❌ |
OFP was founded in February 2022 with CEO Ruggero Catalano Rossi Danielli, based in London. DNA Funded, founded in October 2024, operates under CEO Martin Doepke in Melbourne, Australia.
| Funding Program Options | OFP | DNA Funded |
|---|---|---|
| One-step Evaluation | ❌ | ✅ |
| Two-step Evaluation | ❌ | ✅ |
| Instant Funding | ✅ | ✅ |
OFP offers only an instant funding program, while DNA Funded provides a more diverse range of funding options, including a one-step evaluation, two-step evaluation, and instant funding.
| Trading Rules/Objectives | OFP | DNA Funded |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Target | ❌ | ❌ |
| Maximum Daily Loss | 3%, 4%, or 5% | ❌ |
| Maximum Loss | 6%, 8%, or 10% (Trailing) | 4% (Trailing) |
| Minimum Trading Days | No Minimum | 3 Calendar Days |
| Maximum Trading Period | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Leverage | 1:100 | 1:30 |
| Profit Split | 26% up to 80% | 80% up to 90% |
OFP’s instant funding plan features trailing maximum losses and higher leverage, while DNA Funded offers lower loss limits but a higher profit split.
| Account Size | OFP | DNA Funded |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $18.25 up to $166.80 | $199 |
| $10,000 | $25.75 up to $249.60 | $309 |
| $25,000 | $42.75 up to $399 | $559 |
| $50,000 | $87 up to $788.40 | $979 |
| $100,000 | $171.50 up to $1,507.80 | ❌ |
| $200,000 | $338 up to $2997 | ❌ |
| Broker | OFP | DNA Funded |
|---|---|---|
| Broker | Thunder Markets | DNA Markets |
| Trading Platform | cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader | TradeLocker |
Both firms work with tier-1 liquidity providers, but OFP offers a variety of platforms, while DNA Funded uses TradeLocker exclusively.
| Trading Instruments | OFP | DNA Funded |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Pairs | ✅ | ✅ |
| Commodities | ✅ | ✅ |
| Indices | ✅ | ✅ |
| Cryptocurrencies | ✅ | ✅ |
| Bonds | ✅ | ❌ |
OFP offers bonds as a trading instrument, unlike DNA Funded.
| Trustpilot Statistics | OFP | DNA Funded |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.6/5 | 3.8/5 |
| Number of Reviews | 3,427 | 53 |
| 5-Star Ratings | 59% | 53% |
OFP has more reviews but a lower rating compared to DNA Funded, which has a smaller, yet higher-rated community.
In conclusion, both OFP and DNA Funded are solid choices for traders looking for instant funding, but they offer different options. OFP provides a single customizable instant funding program, while DNA Funded offers a broader selection, including multiple evaluations and an instant funding program. Additionally, DNA Funded’s higher profit splits and lower loss limits make it an attractive option for traders seeking better profit opportunities.
If either of these firms interests you, we’ve prepared a unique discount code for you to use while purchasing an instant funding program!
Share this post
Features
Company