October 2, 2025
Welcome to our detailed comparison between Prop Number One and Direct Funded Trader, where we explore the major aspects of both firms, including their company details, funding options, trading rules, pricing, platforms, and community feedback.
| Company Details | Prop Number One | Direct Funded Trader |
|---|---|---|
| Incorporation Date | June 2024 | February 2023 |
| CEO | Luca Cerullo | Arthur Kaziu |
| Office Location | Dubai, United Arab Emirates | Dubai, United Arab Emirates |
| Scaling Plan | ❌ | ✅ |
Prop Number One, founded in mid-2024 under CEO Luca Cerullo, operates out of Dubai. Direct Funded Trader, led by Arthur Kaziu, launched earlier in 2023 and also runs from Dubai, with the added benefit of a scaling plan.
| Funding Options | Prop Number One | Direct Funded Trader |
|---|---|---|
| One-step Evaluation | ❌ | ✅ |
| Two-step Evaluation | ✅ | ✅ |
| Instant Funding | ❌ | ❌ |
Prop Number One offers a straightforward two-step challenge, while Direct Funded Trader provides more flexibility with two one-step models alongside their two-step program.
| Trading Objectives | Prop Number One | Direct Funded Trader |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Target (Phase 1) | 5% | 8% |
| Profit Target (Phase 2) | 8% | 5% |
| Maximum Daily Loss | Phase 1: 5% / Phase 2: 4% | 5% |
| Maximum Loss | Phase 1: 10% / Phase 2: 8% | 10% |
| Minimum Trading Days | Phase 1: None / Phase 2: 3 days | 5 calendar days |
| Trading Period | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Leverage | 1:50 | 1:100 |
| Profit Split | 100% + Monthly Salary | 80% |
Prop Number One stands out with a 100% profit split plus salary, while Direct Funded Trader allows higher leverage (1:100) for more aggressive trading.
| Account Size | Prop Number One | Direct Funded Trader |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | ❌ | $31 |
| $7,000 | $47 | ❌ |
| $10,000 | ❌ | $27 |
| $15,000 | ❌ | $100 |
| $17,000 | $147 | ❌ |
| $25,000 | ❌ | $199 |
| $27,000 | $197 | ❌ |
| $50,000 | $297 | $299 |
| $100,000 | $527 | $479 |
| $200,000 | $997 | $979 |
| $300,000 | $1,447 | ❌ |
Direct Funded Trader provides more lower entry options, while Prop Number One leans toward larger accounts with competitive pricing.
| Prop Number One | Direct Funded Trader | |
|---|---|---|
| Broker | Tier-1 Liquidity Provider (simulated DMA) | Blueberry Markets |
| Platforms | cTrader, DXtrade, Match-Trader | MetaTrader 5 |
| Instrument | Prop Number One | Direct Funded Trader |
|---|---|---|
| Forex Pairs | ✅ | ✅ |
| Commodities | ✅ | ✅ |
| Indices | ✅ | ✅ |
| Stocks | ❌ | ✅ |
| Crypto | ✅ | ✅ |
| Trustpilot | Prop Number One | Direct Funded Trader |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.0/5 |
| Reviews | 516 | 324 |
| 5-Star % | 86% | 73% |
Prop Number One currently enjoys higher ratings and stronger feedback, while Direct Funded Trader still maintains a good reputation with a growing user base.
Both Prop Number One and Direct Funded Trader deliver strong opportunities in the prop trading space, but they cater to slightly different trader profiles.
Prop Number One: Focuses on two-step funding with 100% profit splits plus salary, ideal for traders seeking maximum payout.
Direct Funded Trader: Provides more entry options, one-step challenges, and higher leverage, making it attractive for traders who value flexibility and faster access.
👉 If either firm sparks your interest, don’t forget to use our exclusive discount code when signing up for an evaluation.
Share this post
Features
Company